The 10-minute walk after meals: what it does to your blood sugar
The trial numbers, why timing matters more than distance, and how to fit three short walks into a normal workday.
Pick an activity, enter your weight and the minutes you spent, and get the calories you burned from the same MET values researchers use, with a table for walking, running, cycling and more.
This is the gross figure: the Compendium of Physical Activities MET value for the activity, times your weight and minutes. It includes the roughly 1 MET you would have burned resting anyway, so the exercise-only (net) number is a little lower.
Every activity in the list carries a MET value, short for metabolic equivalent of task. One MET is the energy you use sitting quietly, defined in research as 3.5 milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute, or roughly one calorie per kilogram per hour. A 3.5-MET walk costs three and a half times your resting rate; a 9.8-MET run almost ten times.
The values come from the Compendium of Physical Activities, the reference table researchers have used since 1993 and last updated in 2024. The math: calories = MET × 3.5 × kg ÷ 200 × minutes. A 160-lb woman walking briskly at 4.0 mph (4.3 MET) for 30 minutes burns about 164 calories.
Moving a heavier body costs more energy, so the same walk at 200 lb burns a third more than at 150 lb. It is also why the number drifts down as you lose weight: the same route slowly gets cheaper.
Speeding up from 3.0 to 4.0 mph raises the per-minute burn by about a quarter. Walking twice as long doubles it. For most people over 40, adding 15 minutes is easier on the knees and the calendar than adding a mile per hour.
A slower mile takes longer, so calories per mile change less than calories per minute. At 150 lb, a mile walked at 3.0 mph comes to about 83 calories and a mile run at 6 mph about 117. Per minute, the run burns almost three times as much.
The table lists each activity's MET value and the calories burned in 30 minutes at 150 and 200 lb. The Compendium classes 3.0 to 5.9 MET as moderate and 6.0 and above as vigorous, so everything from easy walking to dancing counts toward the CDC's 150 weekly moderate minutes; hiking, jogging, running, moderate cycling and stairs count toward the 75 vigorous ones.
| Activity | MET | 30 min at 150 lb | 30 min at 200 lb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walking, 2.5 mph (easy) | 3.0 | 107 | 143 |
| Walking, 3.0 mph (moderate) | 3.5 | 125 | 167 |
| Walking, 4.0 mph (brisk) | 4.3 | 154 | 205 |
| Hiking | 6.0 | 214 | 286 |
| Jogging (general) | 7.0 | 250 | 333 |
| Running, 6 mph (10-min mile) | 9.8 | 350 | 467 |
| Running, 7.5 mph (8-min mile) | 11.5 | 411 | 548 |
| Cycling, leisure | 4.0 | 143 | 191 |
| Cycling, moderate effort | 6.8 | 243 | 324 |
| Swimming laps, moderate | 5.8 | 207 | 276 |
| Strength training | 3.5 | 125 | 167 |
| Yoga (hatha) | 2.5 | 89 | 119 |
| Gardening | 3.8 | 136 | 181 |
| Housework | 3.3 | 118 | 157 |
| Climbing stairs | 8.0 | 286 | 381 |
| Dancing | 5.5 | 196 | 262 |
| Elliptical trainer | 5.0 | 179 | 238 |
The calculator shows gross calories: everything you burned during the activity, including the roughly 1 MET you would have spent on the couch. Net, exercise-only calories subtract that share. For a 3.5-MET walk, net is about 70 percent of gross; for a 9.8-MET run, about 90 percent. Treadmills and most watches also report gross, so the numbers compare, but if you are counting calories to lose weight, net is the honest figure.
Each MET is a mean from lab measurements of many people, and the Compendium authors say that individual costs vary. A trained runner is more economical at 6 mph than a beginner and burns less; a new walker pushing a stroller on gravel burns more. Incline, wind, load, heat and how much of your weight is muscle are not in the number.
In a 2017 Stanford study of seven wrist devices, heart rate was accurate to within 5 percent on most, but no device estimated energy expenditure within 20 percent of lab measurements. Errors ranged from about 27 percent for the best device to 93 percent for the worst. A chest strap fixes the heart-rate part, not the calorie model behind it.
Calories burned rarely translate one to one into weight change. Reviews of exercise trials find that many people eat a little more and move a little less on training days, and that the fat lost over months is usually less than the burned calories predict, with large differences between individuals. The number tells you what the session cost, not what the scale will do.
Not a ranking, in no particular order. How we make money.
The chest strap most validation labs use as their heart-rate reference; it makes the heart-rate half of a calorie estimate reliable, but the calorie number is still a model.
The budget option: light, cushioned and wide enough for most feet, which is what keeps a daily 30-minute walk from stopping in week three; they wear out faster than $130 trainers.
Folds in half and slides under a couch; tops out around 3.7 mph, so it covers the 3.0 to 3.5 MET rows of the table on rainy days but not brisk walking or jogging.
It depends on speed, weight and time. At 150 lb, 30 minutes at 3.0 mph burns about 125 calories and a brisk 4.0 mph pace about 154. At 200 lb the same walks come to about 167 and 205. Per mile, walking at 3.0 mph costs about 83 calories at 150 lb.
At 150 lb, a mile at 6 mph (9.8 MET, a 10-minute mile) burns about 117 calories, and at 200 lb about 156. A faster mile burns slightly more per mile but much more per minute. As a rough rule from the MET math, running costs about 0.75 to 0.8 calories per pound of body weight per mile.
A MET, or metabolic equivalent of task, is a multiple of your resting energy use; one MET equals about one calorie per kilogram of body weight per hour. The Compendium of Physical Activities assigns a MET value to hundreds of activities. Multiply the MET by your weight in kilograms and the hours you spent, and you have an estimate of gross calories burned.
Gross. The result includes the roughly one MET you would have burned at rest during the same minutes. To get net, exercise-only calories, subtract 1 from the MET before doing the math: a 3.5-MET walk becomes 2.5 MET, so net is about 70 percent of gross. Most fitness trackers and treadmill displays also report gross.
Wrist devices estimate calories from heart rate, motion and a built-in model, and the model is the weak link. In a 2017 Stanford validation study of seven popular wearables, no device estimated energy expenditure within 20 percent of lab measurements; errors ranged from about 27 to 93 percent. Heart rate itself was accurate on most of them. Treat the watch's calorie count as a trend, not a total.
Yes. The MET value covers the session itself, not what the muscle does afterward. Strength training is the activity that preserves lean mass as you age, and lean mass is what keeps your resting burn from falling. The CDC recommends muscle-strengthening work on two or more days a week regardless of the calories it shows here.
This calculator is for general information and is not medical advice. Results are estimates from population formulas and can be off for you personally. Talk to a clinician before acting on a number, especially if you take medication or have a diagnosed condition. Editorial policy · Medical disclaimer